SecBaseline/SSP Studio
Back to home
Sample · read only

Acme Federal System

An illustrative SSP. Overall FIPS 199 impact Moderate · 45/47 controls implemented (96%).

Sign in to edit, draft narratives, and export
System Security Plan
Acme Federal System
AFS-001 · Major Application · Operational
FIPS 199Moderate·BaselineModerate

1. FIPS 199 Categorization

Information typeCIA
C.2.8.7 Information Sharing
SP 800-60
ModerateModerateLow
C.3.5.1 System Development
SP 800-60
LowModerateLow
D.14.2 General Information
LowLowLow

Overall impact computed as the high-water mark across all information types: Moderate.


2. System Description

Acme Federal System (AFS) is a web-based case-tracking application that supports inter-agency information sharing for the Acme Program Office. AFS ingests structured records from authorized partner agencies, routes them through a workflow engine, and presents them to authenticated government users for review and adjudication.

2.1 Architecture overview

Three-tier architecture: React single-page application, containerized Node.js API behind an authenticated API gateway, and a managed PostgreSQL database. All compute runs in the FedRAMP-Moderate-authorized Lovable Federal Cloud (LFC). External partner submissions arrive over mTLS via the API gateway.

2.2 Authorization boundary

The authorization boundary includes the AFS web application, API services, application database, key management service, audit log pipeline, and operator administrative interfaces hosted in LFC. Partner agency systems and end-user workstations are outside the boundary.

2.3 Operating environment

LFC us-gov-east region; production isolated from development and staging by separate accounts. Bastion-less access via identity-aware proxy with PIV-backed authentication.

2.4 Interconnections

  • Partner Agency Submission APISystem-to-system mTLS · Inbound case submissions from authorized partner agencies.
  • Enterprise SIEMAudit forwarding · Outbound audit log forwarding to the enterprise SIEM.

3. Control Implementation

ACAccess Control

AC-1Policy and ProceduresImplementedSystem-Specific

The Acme Program Office maintains an Access Control policy and supporting procedures approved by the System Owner and issued to all AFS personnel through the program policy portal. The policy defines account types, authorization workflow, least-privilege expectations, and remote access rules for AFS. The ISSO reviews the policy annually and after any significant system change, and records the review in the program governance log.

AC-2Account ManagementImplementedSystem-Specific

AFS account management is performed by the ISSO and delegated System Administrators through the AFS Identity Console. Account types are Standard (case reviewer), Privileged (administrator), Service (system-to-system), and Emergency (break-glass). All account creations require a signed access request and supervisor approval recorded in the access management system. Standard accounts are reviewed quarterly; Privileged accounts are reviewed monthly. Accounts inactive for 35 days are automatically disabled; accounts inactive for 90 days are removed. Separation of personnel triggers same-day deprovisioning via the HR-to-AFS connector.

AC-3Access EnforcementImplementedSystem-Specific

AFS enforces approved authorizations through role-based access control implemented in the application authorization layer. Each authenticated identity is mapped to exactly one AFS role (Case Reviewer, Supervisor, Administrator, or Auditor), and every API request is evaluated against the role's permission set before any case data is returned. Database access is restricted to the application service account; no interactive database logins are permitted for end users.

AC-4Information Flow EnforcementImplementedHybrid

Information flows between AFS components and external partners are constrained by the API gateway policy set. Inbound partner submissions are accepted only over mTLS from allow-listed client certificates and are schema-validated before entering the workflow engine. Outbound flows are limited to audit forwarding to the enterprise SIEM; no other egress paths are permitted from the application subnets.

AC-5Separation of DutiesImplementedSystem-Specific

AFS separates duties by dividing case adjudication, supervisory approval, and system administration across distinct roles that cannot be held simultaneously by one account. Administrators can manage accounts and configuration but cannot adjudicate cases; reviewers and supervisors have no administrative privileges. Role assignments are approved by the System Owner and reviewed during the quarterly account review.

AC-6Least PrivilegeImplementedSystem-Specific

AFS applies least privilege by granting each role the minimum permissions required for its function and by issuing privileged accounts separately from a user's standard account. Privileged operations require re-authentication and are logged with the operator identity, action, and target. Service accounts are scoped to a single integration and hold no interactive login rights.

AC-7Unsuccessful Logon AttemptsImplementedHybrid

Authentication attempts are handled by the Lovable Federal Cloud identity-aware proxy, which locks an account after five consecutive invalid attempts within a 15-minute window and holds the lock for 30 minutes or until an administrator unlocks it. AFS records the lockout event in its own audit log and forwards it to the enterprise SIEM.

AC-8System Use NotificationImplementedSystem-Specific

AFS displays the approved Acme Program Office system use notification banner before authentication completes. The banner states that the system is a U.S. Government information system, that use is monitored and recorded, and that unauthorized use may result in disciplinary or criminal action. The user must acknowledge the banner before the application session is established, and the acknowledgement is recorded in the audit log.

AC-17Remote AccessImplementedHybrid

All AFS access is remote by design and is mediated by the LFC identity-aware proxy over TLS 1.2+ with PIV-backed authentication; there is no direct network path to AFS services from the public internet. Administrative access additionally requires membership in the privileged access group and originates from managed government workstations. Remote sessions are terminated after 15 minutes of inactivity.

ATAwareness and Training

AT-1Policy and ProceduresImplementedSystem-Specific

The Acme Program Office maintains security awareness and training policy and procedures that apply to all AFS personnel, including contractors. The policy defines initial training requirements, annual refresh, and role-based training obligations, and is reviewed annually by the ISSM.

AT-2Literacy Training and AwarenessImplementedSystem-Specific

All AFS users complete agency security literacy and insider-threat awareness training before receiving an account and annually thereafter. Completion records are maintained in the agency learning management system; the ISSO reconciles the account roster against completion records each quarter and disables accounts that fall out of compliance.

AT-3Role-Based TrainingImplementedSystem-Specific

Personnel with privileged AFS roles complete role-based training covering account management, secure configuration, audit review, and incident handling procedures before privileged access is granted and annually thereafter. Developers additionally complete secure coding training aligned to the program's SDLC requirements.

AUAudit and Accountability

AU-1Policy and ProceduresImplementedSystem-Specific

The Acme Program Office maintains an Audit and Accountability policy and procedures covering event selection, record content, retention, protection, and review responsibilities for AFS. The ISSO owns the procedures, and the ISSM approves them annually.

AU-2Event LoggingPartially ImplementedSystem-Specific

AFS generates audit records for authentication, authorization decisions, case lifecycle events, and administrator actions. Audit records are forwarded to the enterprise SIEM via the LFC audit pipeline. Coverage of read-only access events (queries, exports) is in progress and tracked as a POA&M item.

  • [needs information] Audit coverage for read-only query and export events is not yet implemented
AU-3Content of Audit RecordsImplementedSystem-Specific

AFS audit records capture the event type, timestamp in UTC, originating source and client address, the authenticated subject identity, the affected case or object identifier, and the outcome of the event. Records are emitted in structured JSON so the enterprise SIEM can parse and correlate them without transformation.

AU-6Audit Record Review, Analysis, and ReportingImplementedSystem-Specific

The ISSO reviews AFS audit findings weekly using saved SIEM queries for failed authentications, privilege changes, and bulk case exports. Correlation rules generate real-time alerts for high-risk patterns, which route to the program security inbox and the on-call administrator. Review results and any follow-up actions are recorded in the monthly security posture report.

AU-9Protection of Audit InformationImplementedInherited (Common)

This control is inherited from the Lovable Federal Cloud FedRAMP-Moderate authorization package. See the LFC SSP, control AU-9, for implementation details. AFS configures the platform feature in accordance with LFC customer responsibilities.

AU-12Audit Record GenerationImplementedSystem-Specific

Audit record generation is enabled at the application, API gateway, and database layers, and cannot be disabled by application users. The set of auditable events is defined in configuration managed under change control, and the ISSO is the only role authorized to request changes to audit event selection.

CMConfiguration Management

CM-1Policy and ProceduresImplementedSystem-Specific

Configuration management policy and procedures for AFS are maintained by the Acme Program Office and define the change control board, change request workflow, emergency change handling, and baseline documentation requirements. The procedures are reviewed annually.

CM-2Baseline ConfigurationImplementedInherited (Common)

This control is inherited from the Lovable Federal Cloud FedRAMP-Moderate authorization package. See the LFC SSP, control CM-2, for implementation details. AFS configures the platform feature in accordance with LFC customer responsibilities.

CM-6Configuration SettingsImplementedSystem-Specific

AFS container images and infrastructure are built from hardened baselines defined as code and aligned to the applicable DISA STIG and CIS Benchmark settings for the underlying platform. Settings are enforced at deploy time by policy checks in the CI/CD pipeline; deviations require a documented exception approved by the ISSM. Configuration drift is detected by the platform compliance scanner and reported weekly.

CM-7Least FunctionalityImplementedSystem-Specific

AFS runs minimal container images with only the packages required by the application runtime; interactive shells, package managers, and compilers are excluded from production images. Network policy restricts each service to the specific ports and destinations it requires, and unused platform services remain disabled.

CM-8System Component InventoryImplementedSystem-Specific

The AFS component inventory is generated from infrastructure-as-code state and the container registry on every deployment, and includes service names, image digests, versions, owners, and network exposure. The inventory is stored with the system record and reconciled against the platform asset inventory monthly.

CPContingency Planning

CP-1Policy and ProceduresImplementedSystem-Specific

Contingency planning policy and procedures for AFS are maintained by the Acme Program Office and define recovery roles, notification paths, plan testing requirements, and coordination with the LFC platform team. The plan and procedures are reviewed annually.

CP-2Contingency PlanImplementedSystem-Specific

The AFS Contingency Plan documents a Recovery Time Objective of 8 hours and a Recovery Point Objective of 1 hour, identifies the recovery team and alternate contacts, and describes failover to the secondary LFC availability zone. The plan is exercised annually through a tabletop event with the System Owner, ISSO, and platform operations, and lessons learned are incorporated within 30 days.

CP-9System BackupPlannedSystem-Specific

AFS will use the LFC managed-database point-in-time recovery feature for the application database, with periodic logical exports to encrypted object storage in a separate account. Backup verification will be performed quarterly.

  • [needs information] Backup frequency and retention period not yet defined
  • [needs information] Off-site storage region not yet selected
  • [needs information] Restoration test cadence not yet scheduled
CP-10System Recovery and ReconstitutionImplementedSystem-Specific

AFS recovery is performed by redeploying infrastructure-as-code definitions into the recovery environment and restoring the application database from managed point-in-time recovery. Post-recovery validation includes configuration verification, an audit pipeline health check, and a sample case integrity review before the system is returned to service.

IAIdentification and Authentication

IA-1Policy and ProceduresImplementedSystem-Specific

Identification and authentication policy and procedures for AFS are maintained by the Acme Program Office, covering identity proofing coordination, authenticator issuance, multifactor requirements, and account recovery. The ISSM approves the procedures annually.

IA-2Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users)ImplementedHybrid

Identification and authentication of organizational users is satisfied jointly by AFS and the Lovable Federal Cloud identity-aware proxy. Users authenticate to LFC using PIV credentials; LFC asserts a signed identity token to AFS over an authenticated channel. AFS verifies the token signature, maps the user to an AFS account, and enforces application-level role authorization. Multifactor authentication for privileged accounts is enforced by the LFC identity layer (PIV + cryptographic token).

IA-5Authenticator ManagementImplementedHybrid

Authenticators for AFS users are PIV credentials issued and managed under the agency's credentialing program; AFS itself stores no user passwords. Service account credentials are stored in the LFC key management service, rotated every 90 days, and are never embedded in source code or container images. Emergency break-glass credentials are sealed, stored in the program safe, and rotated after any use.

IA-8Identification and Authentication (Non-Organizational Users)ImplementedSystem-Specific

Non-organizational users do not access the AFS user interface. Partner agency systems authenticate as non-organizational entities using mutually authenticated TLS client certificates issued through the partner onboarding process, with each certificate bound to a single registered partner and revocable on request from the sponsoring agency.

IRIncident Response

IR-1Policy and ProceduresImplementedSystem-Specific

Incident response policy and procedures for AFS are maintained by the Acme Program Office and align with the agency CSIRC handbook, defining severity classification, escalation timelines, evidence handling, and US-CERT reporting responsibilities. The procedures are reviewed annually.

IR-4Incident HandlingImplementedSystem-Specific

Suspected AFS incidents are triaged by the ISSO with support from the agency CSIRC. Containment options include disabling affected accounts, revoking partner certificates, and isolating application services through platform network policy. Eradication and recovery follow the Contingency Plan, and every incident produces an after-action report with corrective actions tracked to closure.

IR-6Incident ReportingImplementedSystem-Specific

Confirmed AFS incidents are reported to the agency CSIRC within one hour of determination, and the CSIRC handles onward US-CERT notification within federally required timelines. The System Owner and Authorizing Official are notified in parallel for any incident classified as moderate severity or higher.

RARisk Assessment

RA-1Policy and ProceduresImplementedSystem-Specific

Risk assessment policy and procedures for AFS are maintained by the Acme Program Office and define assessment scope, frequency, scanning requirements, and risk acceptance authority. The ISSM reviews the procedures annually.

RA-3Risk AssessmentImplementedSystem-Specific

A system-level risk assessment for AFS is performed at least annually and after significant changes, evaluating threats to the case-tracking workflow, partner interconnections, and hosted data. Results are documented in the AFS risk assessment report, and residual risks are presented to the Authorizing Official with recommended treatment.

RA-5Vulnerability Monitoring and ScanningImplementedSystem-Specific

AFS container images are scanned for known vulnerabilities on every build and daily in the registry; authenticated web application scans run monthly against the staging environment. Critical findings are remediated within 15 days, high within 30 days, and moderate within 90 days, with exceptions tracked as POA&M items approved by the ISSM.

SCSystem and Communications Protection

SC-1Policy and ProceduresImplementedSystem-Specific

System and communications protection policy and procedures for AFS are maintained by the Acme Program Office and describe boundary protection expectations, encryption requirements, key management responsibilities, and the division of responsibility with the LFC platform. The procedures are reviewed annually.

SC-7Boundary ProtectionImplementedInherited (Common)

This control is inherited from the Lovable Federal Cloud FedRAMP-Moderate authorization package. See the LFC SSP, control SC-7, for implementation details. AFS configures the platform feature in accordance with LFC customer responsibilities.

SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and IntegrityImplementedInherited (Common)

Transmission confidentiality and integrity is inherited from the Lovable Federal Cloud platform, which terminates TLS 1.2+ with FIPS 140-validated cryptographic modules at the platform edge and enforces mTLS for all internal service-to-service traffic. See the LFC SSP, control SC-8, for implementation details.

SC-12Cryptographic Key Establishment and ManagementImplementedHybrid

Cryptographic keys used by AFS are generated, stored, and rotated within the LFC key management service using FIPS 140-validated modules. Application data-encryption keys are rotated annually and on personnel change affecting key custodians; partner mTLS certificates are issued for one year and revoked immediately on partner offboarding.

SC-13Cryptographic ProtectionImplementedInherited (Common)

This control is inherited from the Lovable Federal Cloud FedRAMP-Moderate authorization package. See the LFC SSP, control SC-13, for implementation details. AFS configures the platform feature in accordance with LFC customer responsibilities.

SC-28Protection of Information at RestImplementedInherited (Common)

This control is inherited from the Lovable Federal Cloud FedRAMP-Moderate authorization package. See the LFC SSP, control SC-28, for implementation details. AFS configures the platform feature in accordance with LFC customer responsibilities.

SISystem and Information Integrity

SI-1Policy and ProceduresImplementedSystem-Specific

System and information integrity policy and procedures for AFS are maintained by the Acme Program Office and cover flaw remediation timelines, malicious code protection, monitoring responsibilities, and alert handling. The ISSM approves the procedures annually.

SI-2Flaw RemediationImplementedSystem-Specific

AFS dependencies and base images are monitored continuously by the pipeline's software composition analysis tooling, and patched images are rebuilt and deployed on the remediation timelines defined in the vulnerability management procedure. Emergency patches for actively exploited vulnerabilities may be deployed under the expedited change process with retroactive change board review.

SI-3Malicious Code ProtectionImplementedHybrid

Malicious code protection for the underlying compute platform is provided by LFC endpoint protection. AFS additionally scans every partner-submitted file attachment with the platform antimalware service before it is written to storage, and quarantines and alerts on any detection.

SI-4System MonitoringImplementedHybrid

AFS is monitored through platform telemetry, application health checks, and SIEM correlation rules covering authentication anomalies, privilege escalation, unusual export volume, and integration failures. Alerts route to the on-call administrator and the program security inbox, and monitoring coverage is reviewed with the ISSO each quarter.


4. Roles & Responsibilities

System OwnerJane Pateljane.patel@acme.govAcme Program Office
Authorizing OfficialLt. Col. M. Reyesm.reyes@acme.gov
ISSOD. Okaford.okafor@acme.gov
ISSMS. Whitfields.whitfield@acme.gov

Appendix A. OSCAL Export Readiness

This SSP exports to OSCAL SSP JSON v1.x. Sign in to export or hand off to the OSCAL Bridge for machine-readable validation.


Disclaimer. Reflects user-provided and user-confirmed information. Requires ISSO/ISSM review and does not constitute an ATO. Verify against current baseline (800-53 Rev 5 / FedRAMP) and program requirements.

Get started

Ready to document your own system?

Create an account to start a new SSP, categorize information types, select a baseline, and draft 800-53 control narratives.

Start a new SSP